{"id":400152,"date":"2000-10-04T22:00:00","date_gmt":"2000-10-04T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/?p=400152"},"modified":"2000-10-04T22:00:00","modified_gmt":"2000-10-04T22:00:00","slug":"smalltalk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/flex\/smalltalk\/","title":{"rendered":"Smalltalk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Smalltalk<\/b><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Smalltalk, the creation of Zolt\u00e1n Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k, R\u00f3bert Langh and M\u00e1rton\r\nFernezelyi is the emblematic work of the <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamodell.c3.hu\/\" target=\"_blank\">Media Model exhibition<\/a>. In part,\r\nit is an example of intermedial thinking; in part, it is also a model in\r\nthe strictest sense of the word. The creators perhaps did not plan it\r\nbeforehand exactly in this way, but the work in its present form is merely\r\nthe maquette of an artwork to be realised in its finished form in future.<\/p>\r\n<p>In 1995, John Brockman wrote in his book entitled The Third Culture that a\r\nfundamental tendency of our age is the elimination of mediators. The\r\nrepresentatives of the new layer of the third culture as named by the\r\nauthor (with the first culture being natural scientists, and the second\r\nculture consisting of the social scientists) attempt to express their most\r\nsignificant thoughts in such a way that they be understandable on the part\r\nof the viewer or reader of average intelligence. The representatives of the\r\nthird culture are first and foremost natural scientists  which also\r\nexplains the book publishing boom of the last decade as well, in which\r\nbrain research, among other fields, plays a role alongside the leading area\r\nof interest of astronomy. Publications which previously appeared only in\r\nthe professional journals in the encoded language of mathematics and\r\npsychology have now become popular among the widest of audiences due to the\r\nfact that scientists, who wished to free themselves from the institutional\r\nand theoretical bonds of science, have now brought their work into the\r\npublic sphere in popular form. <\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div class=\"cikkinline_imagestable\">\r\n<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/media\/smalltalk\/01.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"cikkinline_image\"  src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/media\/smalltalk\/th_01.jpg\" width=\"167\" height=\"246\" border=\"0\" alt=\"ZOOM\"><\/a>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The reaction of art to this tendency is in the intent of the transmission\r\nof natural science research, or in rendering it attainable via a new\r\napproach that seeks thematic points of engagement within science. During\r\nrecent years, the research of the border zones of science and art have once\r\nagain become the central theme of theoretical literature.<\/p>\r\n<p>Smalltalk is also interpretable within this relational system, as it\r\nconsciously, and in an ironic format, employs a scientific approach.\r\nNevertheless, it is thus difficult to perceive it as an artwork because,\r\nsimilarly to a scientific experiment or demonstration, it speaks for\r\nitself  and the viewer thus receives that which s\/he expects on the basis\r\nof its description.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>From a scientific perspective, the work may best be compared to a haystack stood on its head that somehow remains upright. Taking off from the fundamental theme of <i>Smalltalk<\/i>, we arrive at the widest range of questions, fanning out along the research topics of contemporary linguistics, psychology, neuroscience, sensory and artificial intelligence. The linguistic line, for instance, engages with the theme of the work of one of the stars of the &#132;third culture&#147;, Steven Pinker, entitled <i>The Language Instinct<\/i>, which was also published in Hungarian translation in 1999. Pinker states that speech, and language in general, is genetically coded. His concepts stirred up a storm in the professional circles, and the standard of the work also referred to several linguists on the level of widely unfolding discourse. In any case, this book made a great impact, with its comparison of human language-learning, taking its launch from determinist foundations, to the computer, which only must be fed with an appropriate quantity of words in order to develop. The dialogue of the robots in <i>Smalltalk<\/i> can only proceed in the direction designated by the authors and the software; thus, in this case, a one-sided genetic determination would be too simple a solution. It might also be the interdependence between Turing and Duchamp, the common denominator of the technical-scientific and artistic approaches, cropping up again and again over the course of decades. Turing&#8217;s machine has been ranked among the calculating bachelor apparatuses of 20<sup>th<\/sup> century culture, practically from the start. The question of whether or not <i>Smalltalk<\/i> is a bachelor apparatus would be, however, the subject of another sort of investigation. (And one more minor Duchamp parallel: a few days prior to the closing of the exhibition, the glass of the touchscreen serving as interface was broken. I believe that due to this, the authors were unable to pronounce the work completely finished.)<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div class=\"cikkinline_imagestable\">\r\n<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/media\/smalltalk\/02.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"  class=\"cikkinline_image\"  src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/media\/smalltalk\/th_02.jpg\" width=\"163\" height=\"246\" border=\"0\" alt=\"ZOOM\"><\/a>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The central motif of the work is the question of the Turing test: Can machines think? Certainly, equally important is the question of whether a conversation between two robots can be considered a work of art.<\/p>\r\n<p>Zolt\u00e1n Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k, who conceived the idea for the project, instead of the usual blind interview, delivers a view, spectacle, to the work. The view is ironic. Manci and B\u00e9la, the two chain-smoking robots, appear as the leading characters of an intellectual sci-fi film. The two names refer to the heroic age of Hungarian computer science, surely the reason the authors chose these names for their first robotic creatures. In their resting state, Manci and B\u00e9la are just like two calmly smoking robots, swooshing away in their spaceship, whilst the mortal crew have been packed into the neighbouring room to hibernate for fifty years. (The spaceship, meanwhile, is none other than the Chinese room under construction continuously for twenty years by the investigators of consciousness. The Chinese room has a nice balcony too, but its entrance is only a touchscreen.)<\/p>\r\n<p>If we look closer at the interface, we discover that the interactivity is only an illusion: one cannot really ask a question. The questions are already given. The methods of Blade Runner, Pirx and the other famous adopters of the Turing test run up against a closed system here. One cannot outwit the robots; they themselves are killing time.<\/p>\r\n<p>Similarly to his earlier works, Zolt\u00e1n Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k has here created a world of independent systems, operating according to its own internal rules, in which the viewer receives the illusion of free communication. We communicate with the artist-robots in such a way that we actually make out from their sentences only that which we would also say, or that which we would like to understand.<\/p>\r\n<!--      <p>J\u00f3zsef M\u00e9lyi<br>\r\n5 October 2000\r-->\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Smalltalk Smalltalk, the creation of Zolt\u00e1n Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k, R\u00f3bert Langh and M\u00e1rton Fernezelyi is the emblematic work of the Media Model exhibition. In part, it is an example of intermedial thinking; in part, it is also a model in the strictest sense of the word. The creators perhaps did not plan it beforehand exactly in this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":630152,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-400152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-flex"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=400152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400152\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/630152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=400152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=400152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exindex.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=400152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}